Well, I'm getting all sorts of links to click on through e-mail and comments here. You send 'em, I'll link 'em -- assuming nobody sends me a porno link or something.
What this blog is all about will continue to evolve with time, but it's focus, again, is going to be written content, print and on the web. That doesn't mean, though, that our broadcast brethren aren't completely welcome to send me stuff, too.
Thought for the day: Yes, the word "amongst" exists. No, it's not a word we should be using. It's "among." (Remember, in such cases, AP style and common sense dictate you always use the shorter form. )
Sunday, January 16, 2005
Good response so far
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Brian Garner (Modern American Usage) says "amongst" is an archaism that is "pretentious at best." He notes, however, that it is more common and tolerable in British English.
Great new blog!
Post a Comment